top of page

Built for the future. //

Behind the Scenes of Our Self-Driving RC Car Project



ree


1. Project Motivation & Scope

This project demonstrates small-scale autonomous driving using a standard RC car chassis, a Raspberry Pi, and a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN). While the platform is an affordable hobby-grade model, the core methods—data collection, sensor processing, and neural network inference—mirror techniques used in full-scale self-driving systems.

Key objectives:

  • Automate Steering & Throttle based on real-time camera input.

  • Employ Python & CNN-based computer vision for lane detection or track following.

  • Optimize for Edge Inference on a Raspberry Pi with limited CPU/GPU resources.



2. Hardware & Electronics Breakdown

  1. RC Car Chassis

    • A standard hobby RC car (~1/10 or 1/12 scale).

    • Includes a servo for steering and an electronic speed controller (ESC) for throttle.

    • Modified to accept control signals from the Pi via GPIO pins or a dedicated motor driver board (e.g., L298N).

  2. Raspberry Pi (Model 3 or 4)

    • Runs a lightweight Linux distribution (Raspberry Pi OS).

    • Handles image capture via the Pi Camera or a USB webcam.

    • Executes CNN inference in Python, typically using frameworks like TensorFlow Lite or PyTorch (with CPU-only support unless using specialized Pi-compatible accelerators).

  3. Camera Module

    • Either the official Pi Camera (CSI interface) or a standard USB webcam.

    • Mounted at the car’s front bumper or slightly above it to mimic a driver’s perspective.

    • Often set to capture frames at 20–30 FPS for smoother real-time inference.

  4. Power Supply

    • Separate LiPo batteries or power banks: one for the RC motors/ESC, another for the Pi if needed.

    • Ensures the Pi’s voltage remains stable under dynamic load conditions from the motors.

Optional Extras

  • Additional Sensors: Ultrasonic or LiDAR for depth measurement or collision avoidance.

  • PWM Driver Board: If you need more precise control signals (e.g., PCA9685 for hardware PWM).

3. Data Collection & Preparation

3.1 Manual Driving Sessions

  1. Remote Control Driving:

    • Drive the RC car manually around a track or indoor course.

    • The Pi records video frames at a chosen frame rate (e.g., 10–20 FPS).

  2. Logging Steering & Throttle:

    • Use a Python script to capture real-time servo/ESC commands from the RC receiver or direct user input.

    • Each camera frame is timestamped and paired with the corresponding steering angle (and throttle if desired) in a CSV or JSON file.

  3. Data Transfer & Storage:

    • Store images locally on the Pi’s microSD card or an attached USB drive.

    • Optionally transfer data via SSH/scp to a more powerful machine for training.

3.2 Data Preprocessing

  • Image Resizing: Common resolutions range from 120×160 to 66×200 pixels to reduce computation.

  • Cropping: Remove sky or car hood from the image to focus on the road or track.

  • Normalization: Scale pixel values (e.g., 0–1 or -1 to 1) to stabilize CNN training.

  • Augmentation (Optional): Random brightness shifts or slight rotations. This can improve generalization, though flips can be problematic since left/right steering is directional.



4. CNN Architecture & Training

4.1 Network Design

A Convolutional Neural Network is employed for end-to-end steering angle prediction. A typical architecture might include:

  1. Input Layer: (height×width×channels) = e.g., (66×200×3).

  2. Conv-Pool Stacks:

    • Convolutional layers (3×3 filters) extracting low-level features.

    • ReLU activation for non-linearity.

    • Max Pooling to reduce spatial dimensions and control overfitting.

  3. Flatten & Fully Connected Layers:

    • Transforms the final convolution output into a 1D vector.

    • Several dense layers with ReLU activation lead to the final output neuron.

  4. Output Layer: Single neuron for steering angle (float value). For throttle, you might have a second neuron or a multi-output model.

Loss Function

  • Mean Squared Error (MSE) is common for regression-based steering predictions.

Optimizer & Training Settings

  • Adam optimizer (learning rate ~1e-3) is often chosen for its adaptive learning properties.

  • Batch sizes typically range from 16 to 64, depending on available system memory.

  • Training can run for 10–50 epochs or until validation loss stabilizes.

4.2 Training Workflow

  1. Environment: Training can occur on a desktop/laptop GPU if the Pi is underpowered. Once trained, the model is converted or saved for inference on the Pi.

  2. Validation & Testing:

    • Split data into train/validation sets (e.g., 80/20).

    • Monitor validation loss to detect overfitting.

  3. Model Conversion:

    • For on-device inference, consider exporting to TensorFlow Lite or a lightweight PyTorch model.


5. Real-Time Inference on the Pi

5.1 Deployment & Integration

  1. Inference Script

    • A Python script captures each camera frame.

    • The CNN processes the frame to output a steering angle (and possibly throttle).

    • Commands are sent via GPIO/PWM to control the servo and ESC in near real-time.

  2. Latency Considerations

    • On a Pi 3 or 4 CPU, typical inference times for a small CNN can range between 30–100ms.

    • Minimizing model size and employing integer quantization can help reduce overhead.

  3. Control Loop

    • A loop runs at a fixed frequency (e.g., 10–20 Hz), capturing a frame, running inference, and updating servo/throttle signals.

    • Additional heuristics or filtering (e.g., exponential smoothing) can stabilize rapid angle changes.


6. Key Observations & Technical Challenges

  1. Limited Computing Resources

    • The Raspberry Pi’s CPU/GPU may constrain CNN complexity. Pruning or compressing models is often necessary for real-time performance.

  2. Data Diversity

    • Model generalization heavily depends on varied training data (lighting conditions, track layouts). Overfitting to a single environment can lead to poor performance elsewhere.

  3. Servo/ESC Calibration

    • Hardware offsets, neutral points, and maximum steering angles vary between RC car models. Fine-tuning these is crucial for consistent control.

  4. Safety & Testing Environment

    • Even at small scale, unexpected inference results can lead to collisions. Testing in open spaces or enclosed tracks reduces risk.


7. Future Plans

  1. Better Models & Hardware

    • Evaluate more powerful single-board computers (e.g., NVIDIA Jetson Nano) or neural accelerators for larger CNN architectures.

    • Investigate advanced model designs (e.g., MobileNet or attention-based networks) to improve speed and accuracy.

  2. Scaling to a Full-Sized Vehicle

    • In the long term, adapt the system to an older automatic car, adding external sensors (LiDAR, radar) and robust fail-safe mechanisms.

    • This would involve integrating drive-by-wire components, advanced safety checks, and compliance with local regulations.

  3. Additional Sensing

    • Incorporate ultrasonic or LiDAR sensors for depth perception and obstacle avoidance.

    • Improve reliability under varied conditions (night driving, uneven terrain).



Conclusion

This RC car project provides a technical foundation in real-time computer vision, deep learning, and embedded systems engineering. By combining a Raspberry Pi, carefully curated training data, and an optimized CNN, it’s possible to achieve autonomous driving at a small scale. Much of this approach can be extended to larger robotics projects, warehouse automation, or eventually converting a full-sized vehicle for more advanced self-driving experiments.

For a detailed, step-by-step tutorial, be sure to check out the full Medium series:


If you’d like to explore how these methods could be applied to enterprise-scale AI solutions or customized robotics, feel free to reach out to us at KaizenDev. We’re always eager to collaborate and push the boundaries of technology.

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page